Keep running the work in your own environment.
Each organization can manage its people, programs, communications, contributions, and reports without sharing access it should not share.
Growth needs more than a plan. It needs a partner.
VentFlow for foundations
Give each nonprofit its own place to run programs and collect results. Then give authorized foundation leaders a clearer way to move between organizations, review progress, and support the work.
Interactive concept • All names and data shown are illustrative
A better way to stay informed
When day-to-day program data and reporting live in the same system, a grant update can become a clearer view of ongoing work — not another spreadsheet assembled at the last minute.
Each organization can manage its people, programs, communications, contributions, and reports without sharing access it should not share.
Review each nonprofit in context without asking teams to maintain a separate version of the same information.
Use a consistent view to identify where work is on track and where a conversation would help.
Interactive portfolio concept
Switch between the fictional organizations below. “All nonprofits” demonstrates a possible rollup; individual views show organization-level detail.
A concept rollup across three fictional grantee organizations.
ⓘ Illustrative data and fictional organizations for this concept.
| Nonprofit | Focus | Key result | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harbor House | Housing | 63 | On track |
| GrowLab Youth | Mentoring | 76 | On track |
| Community Pantry | Food access | 428 | Review |
Access across several nonprofit accounts and true aggregated reporting are different capabilities. This concept shows both so the experience can be evaluated, but a real page should promise cross-organization rollups only after the data model, permissions, and reporting configuration are confirmed.
Visibility with boundaries
Better oversight should not mean giving everyone access to everything. A real setup should define organization boundaries, roles, and reporting access before launch.
Work inside their own organization and see the records needed for their programs and responsibilities.
Organization-level accessAccess only the nonprofit organizations and reporting areas they are authorized to review.
Portfolio-scoped accessReview approved summaries and trends without automatically opening every underlying person-level record.
Summary-level accessHow it could work
Choose shared measures where they genuinely fit, while preserving the unique outcomes each nonprofit tracks.
Forms, custom fields, and program stages collect the information as staff serve people — not months later.
Review an organization’s programs and submitted results, then follow up where the numbers point to a real question.
Straight answers
The proposed experience is built around authorized access across multiple nonprofits. The exact organization structure, roles, and permissions should be confirmed during implementation.
Not by default in this concept. Each nonprofit keeps its own working environment, and access across organizations is limited to authorized foundation users and approved reporting areas.
This mockup includes a rollup to make the idea concrete. True comparison depends on compatible definitions, permissions, and an implemented cross-organization reporting model.
Yes, the concept allows nonprofit-specific fields and outcomes alongside any shared measures that the foundation and nonprofit agree are genuinely comparable.
Free 30-minute foundation conversation
Show us how your nonprofits report today, who needs access, and which results are truly comparable across the portfolio.